Monday, August 21, 2017
"The issue is surrender. This is something real. You don't find people going into the ashram in the morning to meditate with their knees knocking in fear because how terrifying and profound they know that meditation is going to be. But if they were going in there to smoke DMT, you know, they'd be fully riveted in the modalities of what was about to happen. We can tell shit from shinola, it's just that we don't always prefer shinola. I don't advocate it, I mean, there are people who are disappointed, because they say how often do you do it? Well, the answer is, not very often. If I can get it in a couple or three times a year I feel I'm hitting it pretty hard. And the more successful it is, the less often you have to do it. I mean, I know people who say DMT is their favorite drug. And when you say, well when was the last time you did it, they say 1967. It only lasted four minutes - they're still processing it. And they still ARE processing it. They're not just whistling Dixie.
I mean, it is to my mind just the most -- well, I mentioned this earlier, how do they keep the lid on this stuff? And I guess here I'm preaching to the converted because last night everyone said they had an interest in this kind of thing. But they don't keep the lid on sexuality. No society has had it so under control that people didn't have sex. I mean, they might have had sex under weird conditions and under ritual strictures but we are like this salamander who has this option of never developing into its mature form. And to my mind that's a tragedy because this is our birthright. And somehow our inability to get a grip on our global problems has to do with this immaturity about our mental state. The two are, I feel very strongly, linked. And of course we can't get control of the world because we are children in some profound way. And we don't like being children but the culture has reinforced a kind of infantilism. And the way I explain it to myself is - it is a kind of unwillingness to going it alone on a certain level.
I don't know how many of you remember in Brave New World, Huxley's brilliant dystopia, but there's a scene in there where Bernard, who is the guy who's out of it in the novel because in his fetal fluid they got an alcohol contaminant, and so he's different from everybody else in the society and he occasionally can have an original thought, and he and his assigned girlfriend for the evening, or whatever she is, are in a helicopter, and they sweep out past the crematorium where they are recollecting elements for re-use, and he suspends the helicopter over the black bay and she immediately becomes very agitated, restless, anxious, and pleads with him to return to the city. And what it is, it's her anxiety over being alone with the presence of nature - she literally can't take it. And I think there are a lot of people in society, and each of us in our own way at different times, who have in us this neurotic and infantile creature that can't face it alone.
And this going it alone thing is very important. You know Plotinus, the great neo-Platonic philosopher, he spoke of the mystical experience as the flight of going it alone, to be alone. And in the psychedelic experience there is this issue of surrender because a lot of people want to diddle with it. They want to say they did it but they don't want to have to face an actual moment where they put it all on the line. And yet the whole issue with this stuff is to let it lead, to let it show what it wants to show. So, somehow individually, we have to reclaim our experience. The real message, more important than even the psychedelic experience, the real message I try to leave with people in these weekends, is the primacy of direct experience. That as people, the real universe is within your reach. Always. Everything not within your reach is basically unconfirmed rumor. And we insert ourselves like ants or honeybees into hierarchies of knowledge. So we say, what's going on in the world. Well, turn on CNN, you know, and then somehow we're ordered -- we say ah-ha, OK, it's 85 degrees in Baghdad and the wind is out of the northeast at 15 miles an hour, and we feel somehow better now because we are getting the information.
But what we have done is sold out direct experience. And all institutions require this of us - that we somehow redefine ourselves for the convenience of the institution. And this redefinition always involves a narrowing, a denial, so that then if you want to be in Marxist society, if you want to function in Marxist society, you have to define yourself as a Marxist human being. Well, it turns out in a Marxist society there are no homosexuals because that just happens in decadent societies. And if you happen to notice any tendency of this in yourself, you have to deny its existence because this just doesn't happen in a Marxist society. And similarly, every society has this. In our society, if you hear voices we have mental hospitals for you. If you have vast visions of the future, we have drugs that can help you and make this go away. So then somehow, in modern society, the discovery of psychedelics is the discovery that all of this cultural machinery is just Wizard of Oz stuff.
Remember the scene in the Wizard of Oz where the curtain is swept back and they see the little guy there and he says, booming out over the loudspeaker, "Ignore the little man pulling the levers! Ignore the little man pulling the levers!" Well, the little man pulling the levers is what sweeps into view with psychedelics and you discovery ah-ha, culture is provisional. You know, whether we have nine wives or three, whether we tattoo ourselves blue, whether we eat insects or not, all of these things are just decisions that we make and then we congratulate ourselves on our wisdom and we live within that and we hunt down and kill all the people who disagree with us. And that's called having a culture, having a way of life - being somebody.
But I don't see history as a wrong turning. I see it - the metaphor that I like is that of the prodigal son. That there was a reason for this long descent into matter, this peregrination. It was a shamanic journey of some sort. You know, the shaman goes into the world pool, or ascends the world tree to go to the center of the axis of the cosmos, to recover the pearl, the pearl or the gift or the lost soul, and then return with it. This is what history was. It was a descent into the hell-worlds of matter, energy, space, and time - for the purpose of recovering something that was lost. It wasn't lost by us. It was lost by the breathing, the disystile of the planet. Just climax of climate moved us into paradise and then moved us out of paradise.
The story of Eden is the story of history's first drug bust. I mean, it's the story of a whole lot of tension over who's going to take or not take a certain plant which conveys knowledge. And Yahweh wandering in the garden says to himself, "If the man and the woman eat of the fruit, they will become as we are." The issue was co-equality, co-knowledge with the Creator. Well, where do we stand in man's existential march? How does that work? Can we always accept the subservient, infantile position? Is knowledge to be dispensed by gods, and if not gods, then the institutions that appoint themselves as gods over us? Or is it actually that maturity begins with somehow claiming this birthright?
And it is a birthright. And I don't know if a society can survive the claiming of this birthright by a large number of people. Certainly in the 1960's when this was attempted, everyone got very agitated, then it was frozen out. In so-called primitive or preliterate societies, there is the office of the shaman. And the shaman is deputized to act for all of us. In the same way we have airplane mechanics to fix jet engines, we have shamans to explore these hidden and fairly terrifying other dimensions. The people who self-select themselves into a group like this, in a society like that, would be the candidates for this kind of shamanic voyaging."
- Terence Mckenna
Sunday, August 20, 2017
Sunday, August 6, 2017
Monday, July 3, 2017
Cajas at 14,200 ft.
Hiking the Cajas can be relaxing or adventurous. The other day a good friend and I discovered the adventurous when we decided to blaze a new way back to the road. Instead of doubling back the way we came once reaching the target upper lakes at 13,000 ft, we decided to try a return via the ridge line to the east. Our plan was the cross the far ridge line and exit through the next valley. The only problem was, no matter how far down the ridge line we went, there didn't seem to be a reasonable way back down. We ended up traversing the whole ridge line at the 14k ft. level for several hours looking for a way back down. For added interest, there was a strong icy wind blowing out the east the entire time. Late in the afternoon, far past the time when we could have doubled back the way we came without leaving us up there in the dark, we decided the only way down was to tackle a steep slope. Luckily for us, the fog and drizzle didn't move in until we got back down to the road. We started the hike at 7:30am and was at it continuously except for 5-10 minute breaks until 6pm.
Hiking the Cajas can be relaxing or adventurous. The other day a good friend and I discovered the adventurous when we decided to blaze a new way back to the road. Instead of doubling back the way we came once reaching the target upper lakes at 13,000 ft, we decided to try a return via the ridge line to the east. Our plan was the cross the far ridge line and exit through the next valley. The only problem was, no matter how far down the ridge line we went, there didn't seem to be a reasonable way back down. We ended up traversing the whole ridge line at the 14k ft. level for several hours looking for a way back down. For added interest, there was a strong icy wind blowing out the east the entire time. Late in the afternoon, far past the time when we could have doubled back the way we came without leaving us up there in the dark, we decided the only way down was to tackle a steep slope. Luckily for us, the fog and drizzle didn't move in until we got back down to the road. We started the hike at 7:30am and was at it continuously except for 5-10 minute breaks until 6pm.
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
Particle physicists may be missing one
thing if they ever hope to stop chasing their tails down the path of
fundamental particles. Here’s the fundamental concept they’re possibly missing —
there are no particles.
There is only This and That. This is everything we can see. That is everywhere we cannot see. Depending on the arrangement of That, bits of This can be seen. Bits of This only appear to us as particles because of the arrangement of That. It appears there's much more to This than we can see because That blocks our view of it. If That didn’t exist, all of This could be seen. Then we would see all of This as one continuous thing, not particles at all. And, of course, by definition, if This didn't exist, there would be nothing to see anyway, including ourselves. But such conjecture is purely hypothetical since there is no This without That or That without This for reasons, like the source of The Big Bang, science so far must take on secular faith.
Imagine a sheet of blue paper behind a structure. At various points along the structure are holes of any size you please. Now light up the blue paper but not the surface of the structure. If you could not see the structure, all you’d see would be the round spots of blue of various sizes. To think the round spots of blue are separate entities would be mistaken. In actuality, what you are really detecting is nothing but round areas of the solid blue paper showing through the invisible structure. Since the structure is not lit and cannot be seen, your perception makes you believe the round spots of blue have a fundamentally separate nature but this is only an artifact of your limited perception. In this example, the structure is That and the spots of blue are This. In the world of physics, the spots of blue would be called particles.
As long as physicists search for answers by examining This, they will never get a final answer to explain the physical world. The thing called That is changed by higher energies and so the kinds of This we see will always change with detection in the presence of higher energies. Unlike the structure in the example, That is a very dynamic energy medium. Is it any wonder sub-atomic particles seem to wink in and out of existence and exhibit spooky behavior not fully understood yet given the name quantum mechanics? It’s merely an indication that any given energy state causes areas of That to open and close to our perception in uniquely peculiar ways indicative of their frequency.
We must find a way to explore both This and That if we ever hope to glean an understanding of the physical world. And yet once we do, I suspect we will need a higher explanation for the subsequent discovery that such a dualism as This and That is, after all, ultimately an illusion.
There is only This and That. This is everything we can see. That is everywhere we cannot see. Depending on the arrangement of That, bits of This can be seen. Bits of This only appear to us as particles because of the arrangement of That. It appears there's much more to This than we can see because That blocks our view of it. If That didn’t exist, all of This could be seen. Then we would see all of This as one continuous thing, not particles at all. And, of course, by definition, if This didn't exist, there would be nothing to see anyway, including ourselves. But such conjecture is purely hypothetical since there is no This without That or That without This for reasons, like the source of The Big Bang, science so far must take on secular faith.
Imagine a sheet of blue paper behind a structure. At various points along the structure are holes of any size you please. Now light up the blue paper but not the surface of the structure. If you could not see the structure, all you’d see would be the round spots of blue of various sizes. To think the round spots of blue are separate entities would be mistaken. In actuality, what you are really detecting is nothing but round areas of the solid blue paper showing through the invisible structure. Since the structure is not lit and cannot be seen, your perception makes you believe the round spots of blue have a fundamentally separate nature but this is only an artifact of your limited perception. In this example, the structure is That and the spots of blue are This. In the world of physics, the spots of blue would be called particles.
As long as physicists search for answers by examining This, they will never get a final answer to explain the physical world. The thing called That is changed by higher energies and so the kinds of This we see will always change with detection in the presence of higher energies. Unlike the structure in the example, That is a very dynamic energy medium. Is it any wonder sub-atomic particles seem to wink in and out of existence and exhibit spooky behavior not fully understood yet given the name quantum mechanics? It’s merely an indication that any given energy state causes areas of That to open and close to our perception in uniquely peculiar ways indicative of their frequency.
We must find a way to explore both This and That if we ever hope to glean an understanding of the physical world. And yet once we do, I suspect we will need a higher explanation for the subsequent discovery that such a dualism as This and That is, after all, ultimately an illusion.
Friday, May 26, 2017
OM SO HUM
SO is the sound of inhaling breath and HUM is the sound of exhaling breath.
It is used for deep meditation.
No need to pronounce it -- just sit, feel, and think about the vibrations of words,
concentrate on your breath in and out.
Sense the power in the ancient Mantra.
Feel the music of breath.
You will be OM SO HUM.
SO is the sound of inhaling breath and HUM is the sound of exhaling breath.
It is used for deep meditation.
No need to pronounce it -- just sit, feel, and think about the vibrations of words,
concentrate on your breath in and out.
Sense the power in the ancient Mantra.
Feel the music of breath.
You will be OM SO HUM.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






